No, I don't think that the government should be able to spy on us. That would be a direct violation of our privacy as citizens of the United States. Although, I'm sure that the government already spies on certian people.
Everybody should have the right to their own privacy if they were not already proven guilty, or substantially accused of a crime. Suspicion should not be a reason to monitor somebody.
No, I wouldn't turn them in. I would question my spouse as to why she did what she did. I would also try and reason with her as much as I could if she was in a crazed situation.
I would wait until the law came and did their own routine, and answer whatever questions I have to during interrogation. I would never directly turn my spouse in although the situation is dire.
Yeah buddy, you tell him. Already. Give him a little piece of mind. That's how it's done. This has to be 50 characters.
No, absolutely not. The mentally ill are not responsible for their actions depending on their illness state. They should be properly taken care of and treated with kindness, because they don't know what they're doing half of the time.
Vote no for mentally ill trials. Voice your opinion. Only YOU can prevent forest fires.
Yes, I think that the mentally ill should be tried for their crimes. If someone is mentally ill, they should be under proper care and guidance if they are likely to commit something as serious as a crime.
If they were to commit a crime, then the person who is responsible for their care (if anyone), should be tried for the crime as well as the individual who committed the act. That seems fair and just for both sides of the case.
Yes, I think that we should continue to study Shakespeare's literature because it helps you learn different elements of old school writing. It extends your knowledge on the history of the archaic writings, and helps you to comprehend the development of today's writing.
Men have risen to almost global power. Women have taken leadership positions, but never have they completely and successfully led a nation to absolute victory.
Men, also have the physical aggression to propel and determine others to move forward. Women do not have that to a certain extent.
Just don't let things escalate to that type of a chaotic state. That situation should never be seen by the world, and people have responsibilities to manage situations.
Torture is not a justification by sentence of humans. We, as people, do not have the right to give another judement in any fashion. Nobody in this world comes near perfect no matter how scholarly or friendly he or she may be.
Therefore, everyone has his or her own faults. An example of this is when Jesus said "let the first person without sin cast the first stone". That is an exact example of why I believe torture is not acceptable by means of human hands.
So, not only is torture not able to be justified in any way, but torture should not be bestowed upon anyone for any reason.
KaBam! You have one million dollars, and no respect or appreciation. You can spend as much as you like, and your friends all come to you only because you have money. How would you feel if you were placed in this specific situation?
You would end up being betrayed and used all the time. If you have true respect from other people, it doesn't matter how much money you have. You can't buy real respect, it has to be earned through a mutual relationship between two individuals.
Being wealthy does give you respect, but true respect is better to have along with being wealthy. Just wealthy alone does not make a person happy.
Wealth can turn you into someone who has no morals. Wealth can tempt you to make stupid decisions. Respect alone, can help you grow with others, and maybe achieve wealth.
It's better to be loved, the pros counterpoise the cons by a long shot when it comes to being loved. Being loved has almost no cons. The only possible cons that I can cerebrate are being hated on for all the love that you get.
The pros of being loved are gangster. You can make everything happen according to your own rhythm. People would love you enough to serve you, or be friendly enough to create a very good environment. You know.
With all the fear in the world, you can also get things done, but it won't be with the same voluntary attitude. It'll be with a scared demeanor. If someone loves you, they do something out of their own free will, which makes everyone happy. Fear will only have you in a state of temporary service, someone can end up rebelling.
No, lol. People should definitely not be provided with free government tuition for college. This could give them a feeling of laziness, or a "laid back" attitude. It will give people in high school less of a feel for responsibility. People leaving high school should have some sense of the real world, you have to work to get things accomplished. It should not all come free.
People that attend colleges, all the way from local to major, have all worked to some extent to be approved for their acceptance. It helps a person get started and experience some of what the real world has to bring.
If the government were to provide free college tuitions, it would also limit the funding for the colleges themselves. Colleges would have little ways of making money. The government would be paying for your attendance, and also probably have to provide for the food, books, and other material. The colleges would not have enough funding to do that.
If this were to continue than the government would be financially unstable. Obama would be impeached, and maybe we would enter another depression. That's not a good future for us. We should pay. Or else we might turn communist. Seriously, lol, No free college tuition
I ahem believe that schools do kill creativity. Creativity is definitely something that is limitless. School allows you to engage in activities within a limited range. If you were able to excercise your freedoms like using a cell phone, browsing certain internet sites, or listening to music, I believe that you could be a lot more creative.
Creativity is something that a person should feel absolutely free to express. School has many rules and molds a person according to their rules. The person adapts to the school, and is in turn like everyone else, lame. That's not creative. Bending the rules should be a little acceptable, in every case.
School is bad. Not in general, but for the creative part.
