No, I don't think that the government should be able to spy on us. That would be a direct violation of our privacy as citizens of the United States. Although, I'm sure that the government already spies on certian people.

Everybody should have the right to their own privacy if they were not already proven guilty, or substantially accused of a crime. Suspicion should not be a reason to monitor somebody.

No, I wouldn't turn them in. I would question my spouse as to why she did what she did. I would also try and reason with her as much as I could if she was in a crazed situation.

I would wait until the law came and did their own routine, and answer whatever questions I have to during interrogation. I would never directly turn my spouse in although the situation is dire.

Yeah buddy, you tell him. Already. Give him a little piece of mind. That's how it's done. This has to be 50 characters.

No, absolutely not. The mentally ill are not responsible for their actions depending on their illness state. They should be properly taken care of and treated with kindness, because they don't know what they're doing half of the time.

Vote no for mentally ill trials. Voice your opinion. Only YOU can prevent forest fires.

Yes, I think that the mentally ill should be tried for their crimes. If someone is mentally ill, they should be under proper care and guidance if they are likely to commit something as serious as a crime.

If they were to commit a crime, then the person who is responsible for their care (if anyone), should be tried for the crime as well as the individual who committed the act. That seems fair and just for both sides of the case.

Yes, I think that we should continue to study Shakespeare's literature because it helps you learn different elements of old school writing. It extends your knowledge on the history of the archaic writings, and helps you to comprehend the development of today's writing.

Men have risen to almost global power. Women have taken leadership positions, but never have they completely and successfully led a nation to absolute victory.

Men, also have the physical aggression to propel and determine others to move forward. Women do not have that to a certain extent.

Yes, because man has a powerful force within him. Like a burning fire as when Lebron dunks with all his heart. Woman also have a strong force, but in history I have not seen any woman rise to power and successfully lead a whole nation to victorious situations.

In history men have accomplished much, and we have seen that they have the ability to lead correctly. Kobe Bryant is a perfect example of a successful man. Look at the Lakers, successful. I rest my case.

Just don't let things escalate to that type of a chaotic state. That situation should never be seen by the world, and people have responsibilities to manage situations.

Torture is not a justification by sentence of humans. We, as people, do not have the right to give another judement in any fashion. Nobody in this world comes near perfect no matter how scholarly or friendly he or she may be.

Therefore, everyone has his or her own faults. An example of this is when Jesus said "let the first person without sin cast the first stone". That is an exact example of why I believe torture is not acceptable by means of human hands.

So, not only is torture not able to be justified in any way, but torture should not be bestowed upon anyone for any reason.