Return to CreateDebate.commrmountain • Join this debate community

Mr. Mountain's Community



Welcome to Mr. Mountain's Community!

Mr. Mountain's Community is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Jordand

Reward Points:3
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
75%
Arguments:3
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
3 most recent arguments.
0 points

Yes, developed countries should force developing countries to protect the environment. Especially if the developing countries are using the aid for the wrong reasons. For example, if the US was aiding Amsterdam, and Amsterdam was using that money and building nuclear powerplants, then I believe that the US should threaten cutting the aid for that country until they get their act straight. I also think since developing countries are still "developing" then they might not have, for say, cut down that forest, or have large quantities of gas guzzling cars yet. That would be an oppertunity to say, "We will keep funding you only if you preserve the enviornment as you develope, keep that forest, and use eco friendly cars."

1 point

I think the pros do outweigh the cons. Although our economy is in a slump at the moment. The upside is, wew have freedom. We are able to speak freely about government, economics, and pretty much anything we want. Unlike communist countries such as China and Cuba. Even though there have been many struggles such as, the Civil War, the Civil Rights Movement, we have made it this far without falling completely apart. Some people may see us as a country that has tons of issues and needs help, but we have our strengths.

1 point

As for high school i believe we have more freedom in being creative then in middle school. We are allowed to express our creativity through our clothing to a limit, and we are allowed to take classes such as art, theatre, band, and others that allow us to be creative and express ourselves. There are some rules about piercings and other things but that is for the sake of decensy. So overall i dont think schools kill creativity.

Jordand has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here