I like the views and opinions you have in your arguement, although it seemed to long.

Should an injured animal in suffering pain be kept alive? I think that most people known someone,or even had to make the decision themselfs,that they had to put an animal out of there misery. It may have been because of a car accident or a disease such as rabies,witch causes a painful death if it can not be found and cured early enough.

I do agree that euthanasia could be a negative procedure. In my opinion euthanasia is a good thing under certain circumstances.

Thats why people must remember,If death is not intended,it is not an act of euthanasia. Euthanasia is defined as an act of putting to death painlessly or allowing to die,as by withholding extreme medical measures,a person or animal suffering from an incurable, painful disease or condition. It is ultimately a case of freedom choice,and should only be used to provide a way to relieve extreme pain.

I would much rather be wealthy than be in poverty. Although i would choose wealth, a person you can trust is important. Unless you cant truly trust anyone,than there would be no logical reason to be poor and have somone trust you,when you will never trust anyone yourself. Trust is defined as a fiduciary relationship in which one person, known as a "trustee", holds title to property or assets for the benefit of another person, the beneficiary. Furthermore, you can still have friends and family just noone to share to quality of trust with.