Return to CreateDebate.commrmountain • Join this debate community

Mr. Mountain's Community


Candy's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Candy's arguments, looking across every debate.
2 points

I say no because thats invasion of privacy. I mean everyone looks suspicious once in a while, does that mean that the government is going to watch everyone. I think that the only people should be watch are the ones that have a crimminal background to help and protect the lifes of others.

1 point

I would have to pick having a lousy father than not having a father at all because, there will be a point where you may need his help. (It may not help but at least you tried.) I know that I have a lousy father, and there are times that he gets me mad, but then again there are times where he does the dumbest things, and makes me laugh. I know that I don't have the father I want, but I still love him no matter how lousy he is.

1 point

Yes, I think that Shakespeare should be continue studied in high school because it teaches students about the time back then. I also think that Sheakespear can teach us something because when we read it we pay actually pay attention to it. It may also help some students if they are into poerty and plays. So yes I think that Shakespear should be continued in high school.

1 point

I think that schools somewhat kill our creativity because we really don't have much to do but follow the school rules. But just because we can't do what we want to in school doesn't mean that it kills our creativity. We still get to share our thoughts, come up with new ideas, and do all kinds of different things. Besides our creativity doesn't just have to be in school. It can be anywhere you want it to be. So i think that the schools don't kill our creativity it just feels like it does.



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]