Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 4 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 75% |
Arguments: | 4 |
Debates: | 0 |
I strongly believe that both sides are correct to some extent. "Yes" because there are some that do deserve to be monitored for protection of oneself or of others. I decided to choose "No" for one reason, we are all guilty of being suspicious of something. If we monitor one suspicious individual, then we all become suspicious by association. To monitor someone is to infringe the rights of someone. We cannot just deny that right to some and give it to others, that would mean that our government does not give us "Equal rights".
I belive that there are many selfish thoughts/actions among us, some of us give into it. I am a firm beleiver in karma and I go by the saying " Do to others as you would have them do to you". I think there are times when some people should put their own selfish needs aside and think of others . It is true that you are your own important person but there are many that sacrifice and stirve for others that are important to them. In a way, advancing the comming good can be concidered a personal pursuit, there are many that do the commong good for the personal feeling of accomplishing something for others.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |